第1章
注一：這個定義刊登在每一期TA期刊的刊頭。
注二：關於TA的哲學理念和基本觀念，請參考：
Berne,E.,Principles of group treatment.New York:Oxford University Press,1966,chapter 10.
James,M.(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis for psychotherapists and counselors. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1977, chapter 3.
James,M.,and Jongeward,D.,Born to win:transactional analysis with gestalt experiments. Reading:Addison-Wesley,1971(other editions include:New York:Signet,1978),chapter 1.(國內譯本名為《強者的誕生》，遠流出版)。
Steiner,C.Scripts people live:transactional analysis of life scripts.NewYork:Grove Press, 1974,introduction.
Woollams,S.,and Brown,M.,Transactional analysis.Dexter:Huron Valley Institute,1978,chapter 1.
第2章
注一：關於自我狀態的本質和定義，請參考：
Berne,E.,Intuition and ego states.(McCormick,P.,ed.).San Francisco:TA press,1977,chapter 6.
Berne,E.,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy.New York:Grove Press,1961,1966,chapter 2.
Berne,E.,Games people play.New York:Grove Press,1964,chapter 1.
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 10.
Berne,E.,Sex in human loving.New York:Simon and Schuster,1970,chapter 4.
Berne,E.,What do you say after you say hello?New York:Grove Press,1972.chapter 2.(國內譯本名為《語意與心理分析》，國際文化出版)
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 2.
注二：伯恩曾在各個著作中，以不同的角度，為「自我狀態」下了不同的定義，這裡的定義是根據《團體治療的原則》(Principles of group treatment)一書裡的定義，當時並沒有使用「思考」一詞，但是從上下文可以看出，他所用的
「經驗」一詞包括了「思考」的意思在內。
注三：關於自我狀態線索的實證研究很多，主要參考資料有：
Steere,D.,Bodily expressions in psychotherapy.New York:Brunner/Mazel,1982.
Falkowski,W.,Ben-Tovim,D.,and Bland,J.,『The assessment of the ego-states'.British Journal of Psychiatry,137,1980,572-3.
Gilmour,J.,『Psychophysiological evidence for the existence of ego-states'.TAJ,11,3,1981, 207-12.
Williams,J.,et al.,『Construct validity of transactional analysis ego-states'.TAJ,13,1,1983, 43-9.
注四：關於伯恩所解釋，自我狀態和弗洛伊德的三種精神器官有什麼不同，可參考
Intuition and ego- states和Principles of group treatment二書,還有：Drye,R.,『The best of both worlds:a psychoanalyst looks at TA'.In:Barnes,G.(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne:teachings and practices of three TA schools.New York:Harper's College Press,1977,chapter 20.Drye,R., 『Psychoanalysis and TA'.In:Jarnes(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...，chapter 11.
第3章
注一：關於功能分析，請參考：
Abell,R.,Own your own life.New York:David Mckay Co.,1976.
Berne,E.,The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups.Philadelphia:J.B. Lippincott Co.,1963,chapter 9.
Dusay,J.,Egograms.New York:Harper and Row,1977,chapter 1.
Kahler,T.,Transactional analysis revisited.Little Rock: Human Development Publications,1978, chapter 1.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 2.
注二：關於自我圖，可以參考杜謝所著《自我圖》(Egograms)一書，還有Dusay,J.,『Egograms and the constancy hypothesis'.TAJ,2,3,1972,37-42.
杜謝認為「自我圖」這個名詞，只能用在由別人來為我分析時所畫的圖；如果是我為自己所畫的，應該稱為「心理圖」。我們則認為不需如此複雜，兩者均以「自我圖」來表示。
第4章
注一：第二層次結構的基本介紹可見於第2章的注一，也可參考：
Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapters 16 and 17.
Schiff,J.,et al.,The Cathexis reader:transactional analysis treatment of psychosis.New York: Harper and Row,1975,chapter 3.
Steiner,Scripts people five,chapter 2.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 2.
更深入治療的參考資料還有：
Drego,P.,『Ego-state models'.TASI Darshan,1,4,1981.
Drego,P.,Towards the illumined child.Bombay:Grail,1979.
Erskine,R.,『A structural analysis of ego'.Keynote speeches delivered at the EATA conference, July 1986.Geneva:EATA,1987,speech 2.
Hohmuth,A.,and Gormly,A.,『Ego-state models and personality structure'.TAJ,12,2,1982,140-3.
Holloway,W.,『Transactional analysis: an integrative view'.In:Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 11.
Trautmann,R.,and Erskine,R.,『Ego-state analysis:a comparative view'.TAJ,11, 2,1981,178-85.
Summerton,O.,『Advanced ego-state theory'.TASI Darshan,2,4,1982.
注二: English,F.,『What shall I do tomorrow? Reconceptualizing transactional analysis'.In:Barnes (ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Brern,chapter 15.
注三：關於兒童發展的簡介，可以讀：Donaldson,M..Children's minds.London：Fontana,1978.
要探入瞭解皮亞傑(Piaget)關於兒童發展的理論，與其讀他本人汗牛充棟的著作，不如讀經過別人整理的介紹，例如：Maier.H.，Three theories of child development.New York：Harper and Row，1969.
艾瑞克森(Eric Erikson)對兒童情緒發展的研究也很值得一讀：Erikson.E.，Childhood and society.New York：W.W.Norton，1950.
還可以參考Mahler.M.S.，The psychological birth of the human infant.NewYork：Basic Books.1975.
若要看以TA的架構解釋兒童發展的書，可以參考本章注二里Fanita English的文章，其他還有：
Levin,P.,Becoming the way we are.Berkeley:Levin,1974.
Levin,P.,『The cycle of development'.TAJ,12,2,1982,129-39.
Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 4.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 6.
注四: Joines,V.,『Differentiating structural and functional'.TAJ,6,4,1976,377-80.
Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 1.
第5章
注一：關於四種自我狀態的判斷，可以參考：
Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 7.
Berne,Structure and dynamics of organizations and groups,chapter 9.
James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...，chapter 4.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 2.
也可以參考第2章注三，David Steere的書Bodily expressions in psychotherapy。
注二：關於伯恩的能量理論可以參看他的文章：
Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 3,和Principles of group treatment,chapter 13。也可參考:
Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 4.
Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 3.
第6章
注一：關於人格的病理結構，請參考：
Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 4.
Erskine,R.,and Zalcman,M.,『The racket system: a model for racket analysis'.TAJ,9,1,1979,51-9.
Harris,T.,I'm OK,you're OK.New York:Grove Press,1967,chapter 6.(國內譯本名為《我好你也好》，遠流出版)
James,M.,and Jongeward,D.,The people book.Menlo Park:Addison-Wesley,1975,chapter 8.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 9.
Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 3.
注二：關於雙重污染和腳本的關係，請參考：
Erskine and Zalcman.,『The racket system...',p.53.
Kahler,Transactional arialysis revisited,chapter 47.
注三：伯恩關於具有恆定成人自我狀態的人會「無法享受樂趣」的說法，看起來好像與他對成人自我狀態的定義不符合。在伯恩最早對自我狀態模式的敘述裡，成人自我狀態定義為：直接針對此時此地的狀況，所反應的一整套行為、想法和感受。接下來，他又說在成人自我裡也能享受樂趣，當然了，在兒童自我與在成人自我，所享受的樂趣是不一樣的。關於這個看法，也可以參考：
Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 2.
第7章
注一：關於交流的分析,可以參考：
Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 9.
Berne,Games people play,chapter 2.
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 10.
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 2.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 2.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 4.
Steiner,C.,Games alcoholics play.New York:Grove Press,1971,chapter 1.
注二：Karpman,S.,『Options'.TAJ,1,1,1971,79-87.
第8章
注一：關於安撫和需求的本質與定義，請參考：
Berne,Games people play,Introduction.
Berne,Sex in human loving,chapter 6.
Haimowitz,M.,and Haimowitz,N.,Suffering is optional.Evanston: Haimowoods Press, 1976,chapter 2.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 3.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapter 22.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 3.
注二: Spitz,R.,『Hospitalism: genesis of psychiatric conditions in early childhood'.Psychoanalytic studies of the child,1,1945,53- 74.
注三: Levine,S.,『Stimulation in infancy'.Scientific American,202,5,80- 6.
注四: Steiner,C.,『The stroke economy'.TAJ,1,3,1971,9-15.
注五: McKenna,J.,『Stroking profile'.TAJ,4,4,1974,20-4.
注六: English,F.,『Strokes in the credit bank for David Kupfer'.TAJ,1,3,1971,279.
注七: Pollitzer,J.,『Is love dangerous?'Workshop presentation,1980,unpublished.
注八: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 16.
第9章
注一：關於六種時間的結構，可以參考：
Berne,Games people play,chapters 3,4,5.
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 10.
Berne,Sex in human loving,chapters 3 and 4.本書第4章還談到伯恩對親密時的自我狀態的描述。
Berne,What do you say...chapter 2.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 3.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 5.
注二: Boyd,L.,and Boyd,H.,『Caring and intimacy as a time structure'.TAJ,10,4,1980,281-3.
第10章
注一：關於人生腳本的本質、起源、定義，可以參考：
Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 11.
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapters 10 and 12.
Berne,What do you say...,chapters 2,3-6,8-10.
English,F., 『What shall I do tomorrow? Reconceptualizing transactional analysis'.In:Barnes (ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter15.
Holloway,W.,『Transactional analysis: an integrative view'.In:Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 11.
Goulding,M., and Goulding,R.,Changing lives through redecision therapy.
New York:Brunner/Mazel,1979,chapter 2.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapters 2,4.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapters 3,4,5.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 9.
注二: Woollams,S.,『From 21 to 43'.In: Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 16.
注三：關於兒童發展的資料，請參考第4章注三。Pare Levin的文章「發展的循環」(cycles of development)得到伯恩紀念科學獎，她在文內談到人生腳本的發展並不是到青少年時就發展完畢了，發展的階段會在一生中不斷循環下去。
第11章
注一：關於腳本內容的分類，還有如何活出腳本的主題，可以參考：
Berne,What do you say...,chapters 3,11.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapters 6-12.
注二: Woollams,S.,『Cure!?'TAJ,10,2,1980,115-7.
注三: Berne, What do you say...，chapters 14,17.For other views on the physiological aspects of script.還可以參考:
Cassius,J.,Body scripts.Memphis:Cassius,1975.
Lenhardt,V.,『Bioscripts'.In:Stern(ed.),TA:the state of the art,chapter 8.
第12章
注一：關於心理地位，可以參考：
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 12.
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 5.
Berne,E.,『Classification of positions'.Transactional Analysis Bulletin,1,3,1962,23.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 2.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapter 5.
注二：Ernst,F.,『The OK corral:the grid for get-on-with'.TAJ,1,4,1971,231-40.
In agreeing that we use his Corral diagram in this book,Franklin Ernst
asked that we give it his revised subtitle『Grid for what's happening',as in Figure 12.1.
注三：Ernst,F.,『The annual Eric Berne memorial scientific award acceptance speech'.TAJ,12,1,1982, 5-8.
第13章
注一：關於腳本訊息及其傳遞的方式，請參考：
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 7.
English,F.,『What shall I do tomorrow? Reconceptualizing transactional analysis',in: Barnes (ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter15.
Steiner,Scripts people live, chapter 6.
White,J.,and White,T.,『Cultural scripting'.TAJ,5,1,1975,12- 25.
Woollams,S.,『From 21 to 43'.In: Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 16.
注二：Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 5.
注三：Steiner,C.,『Script and counterscript'.TAB,5,18,1966,133-35.關於腳本圖的其他說法，還可以參考：
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 15.
English,F.,『Sleepy, spunky and spooky'.TAJ,2,2,1972,64-7.
English.F.,參考本章注一同一作者資料。
Holloway,W.,『Transactional analysis an integrative view'.In:Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 11.
James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...,chapter 4.
Woollams,S.,參考本章注一同一作者的資料。
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 9.
第14章
注一: Goulding,R.,and Goulding,M.,『New directions in transactional analysis'.In Sager and Kaptan (eds.),Progress in group and family therapy.NewYork:Brunner/Mazel,1972,105-34.
Goulding,R.,and Goulding,M.,『Injunctions, decisions and redecisions'.TAJ,6,1,1976,41-8.
Goulding,R.,and Goulding,M.,The power is in the patient.San Francisco:TA press.1978.(本書第5章和第16章就是取自前面兩篇文章。)
Gouldings,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapters 2，9.(國內譯本名為《再生之旅——藉再決定治療改變一生》，心理出版社出版)
Allen,J.,and Allen,B.,『Scripts: the role of permission'.TAJ,2,2,1972,72-4.
注二: English,F.,『Episcript and the"hot potato" game'.TAB,8,32,1969,77-82.
注三: Berne,What do you say...，chapter 7.
注四：正式的腳本問卷有好幾種，請參考：
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 23.
Holloway,W.,Clinical transactional analysis with use of the life script questionnaire.Aptos: Holloway,undated.
James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...chapter 4.
McCormick,P.,Guide for use of a life-script questionnaire in transactional analysis.San Francisco:Transactional Publications,1971.
McCormick,P.,『Taking Occam's Razor to the life-script interview'.Keynote speeches delivered at the EATA conference,July 1986.Geneva: EATA,1987,speech 5.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 9.
第15章
注一: Berne,Sex in human loving,chapter 5.
Berne,What do you say...chapter .11.
注二: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 60-65.
第16章
注一：Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited，chapter 72。也可參考：
Kahler,T.,and Capers.H.,『The miniscripf.'TAJ,4,1,1974,26-42.請注意前者是後者的修改版本。
注二: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 60-65 and accompanying Summary.
也可參考Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 11。請注意Woollams和Brown所談對驅力和腳本的關係，與Kahler的看法不同。
Kahler認為「要堅強」這個驅力和「永不」腳本有關，而「努力試」和「總是」腳本有關。Woollams和Brown的看法剛好相反。
注三：Kahler.T.,『The miniscript',出處同本章注一。
Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 68-71.
注四: Kahler,T.,workshop presentation, EATA conference, Villars, 1984, unpublished.
注五: Capers,H.,and Goodman,L.,『The survival process: clarification of the miniscript'.TAJ,13, 1, 1983,142-8.
注六：Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapters 73-75 and 78-83。也可參考Kahler and Capers,『The miniscript'，出處同本章注一。前者是後者的修改版本。本書引用的內容是凱樂修改後的版本，但是位置二的「禁止者」是用修改前的版本，凱樂在修訂版把「禁止者」改成位置三，以「順從不良者」當位置二。
注七: Kahler,Transactional analysis revisited,chapter 85.
注一: Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 2.也可參考：
Mellor,K.,and Sigmund,E.,『Discounting'.TAJ,5,3,1975,295-302.
Schiff,A.,and Schiff,J.,『Passivity』TAJ,1,1,1971,71-8.
注二：漠視的這個定義是由席芙在一次工作坊時提出的(未出版)，我們認為比《Cathexis reader》一書第14章所提出的定義「漠視是一種內在心理機轉，包括輕看或忽略關於自己、他人、現實狀況的某些面向」更容易瞭解。
史坦能在《Scripts people Live》一書第9章提出另一種定義：「一種交錯的交流，受到漠視的人由成人自我發出刺激指向對方的成人自我，可是對方卻由父母自我或兒童自我做反應。」乍看之下，史坦能對漠視的定義似乎比席芙更廣泛，可是從史坦能所舉的例子卻可以看出，他所指的情形，其實也是指對方(從父母自我或兒童自我做反應的那一方)「輕看或忽略」別人的某些面向。
第18章
注一：Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader chapter 2.也可參考：
Mellor,K.,and Sigmund,E.,『Discounting,'TAJ,5,3.1975,295-302.
第19章
注一：Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader chapter 5也可參考：
Mellor，K.,and Sigmund,E.,『Redefining'.TAJ,5,3,1975,303-11.
注二：這裡關於「再定義」的意義，是經由本書作者的解釋，我們認為這比《Cathexis reader》書中的定義更清楚而直接。
第20章
注一：Schiff et el.,Cathexis reader,chapter 2，我們更改了席芙定義中的一個字，以「一個人」(single person)代替「整個人」(whole person)。請參考Schiff，A.,and Schiff.J.,『Passivity'.TAJ,1,1,1971,71-8.
共生圖有好幾種畫法，一九七一年席芙夫婦登在TA期刊的文章，只用虛線和實線的圓圈表示自我狀態的界限。在《Cathexis reader》一書，他們又在雙方產生互動的自我狀態間加上箭號。現在常用的圓形就像圖20-1，把產生互助的自我狀態圈在一起，則是Woollams和Huige在本章注二里的文章提出的。
注二：Woollams,S.,and Huige,K.,『Normal dependency and symbiosis'.TAJ,7,3,1977,217-20.
注三: Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 4.
Schiff,S.,『Personality development and symbiosis'.TAJ,7,4,1977,310-6.
第21章
注一：關於扭曲的本質和作用，請參考：
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 13.
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 8.
English,F.,同本章注二和注三的參考資料。
Ernst,F.,『Psychological rackets in the OK corral'.TAJ,3,2,1973,19-23.
Erskine,R.,and Zalcman,M.,『The racket system: a model for racket analysis'.TAJ,9,1,1979, 51-9.
Gouldings,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapters 2,6.
Joines,V.,『Similarities and differences in rackets and games'.TAJ,12,4,1982,280-3.
Zalcman,M.,『Game analysis and racket analysis'.Keynote speeches delivered at the EATA conference,July 1986.Geneva:EATA,1987,speech 4.
注二: English,F.,『The substitution factor: rackets and real feelings'.TAJ,1,4,1971,225-30.
English,F.,『Rackets and real feelings, Part Ⅱ'. TAJ,2,1,1972,23-5.
注三: Thompson, G.,『Fear, anger and sadness'.TAJ,13,1,1983,20-4.
注四: English,F.,『Racketeering'.TAJ,6,1,1976,78-81.
English,F.,『Differentiating victims in the Drama Triangle'.TAJ,6,4,1976,384-6.
注五: Berne,E.,『Trading stamps'.TAB,3,10,127.
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 8.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 8.
第22章
注一：Erskine,R.,and Zalcman,M.,『The racket system：a model for racket analysis'.TAJ,9,1,1979.51-9.
注二：本章的練習原先是由查克曼設計的(在工作坊中示範，並未出版)，經由I.Stewart,A.Lee和K.Brown修改而成(在工作坊中示範,以前未出版)。
第23章
注一：關於心理遊戲的本質，請參考：
Berne,Intuition and ego-state,chapter 7.
Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 10.
Berne,Games people play,chapter 5.
Goulding,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapter 2.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 2,8.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 8.
注二：TA文獻對一個心理遊戲(特別強調單數)到底該定義為一個人自己的連串反應，還是兩個人(或更多人)彼此環環相扣的連串反應，並沒有定論。伯恩較傾向後者，可是他在不同書中所下的定義彼此並不一致。本書採用葛丁夫婦的看法，把一個心理遊戲定義為一個人表現出的連串反應，所以我們認為，如果有兩個人一起玩心理遊戲的話，是各自玩自己的心理遊戲，而兩個心理遊戲是互相連鎖的。
注三: Berne,Games people play,chapter 5.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapter 1.
注四：Berne,What do you say...,chapter 2，本章關於遊戲公式是採用伯恩最後的版本，也可參考本章注九。
注五: Karpman,S.,『Fairy tales and script drama analysis'.TAB,7,26,1968,39-43.
注六: Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 10.
Berne,Games people play,chapter 5.
注七: Gouldings,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapter 2 and page 79(for diagram).
注八：James,J.,『The game plan'.TAJ,3,4,1973.14-7.本書所用的是經由L.Colinson所修改的版本(在工作坊示範，未出版)。
注九：關於心理遊戲的定義，請參考：
Joines,V.,『Similarities and differences in rackets and games',TAJ,12,4,1982,280-3.
Zalcman,M.,『Game analysis and racket analysis'.Keynote speeches delivered at the EATA conference,July 1986.Geneva:EATA,1987,speech 4.
第24章
注一: Berne,Games people paly,chapter 5.
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 8.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 8.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapter 1.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 8.
注二: Schiff et al.,Cathexis reader,chapter 2.
注三: English,F.,『Racketeering'.TAJ,6,1,1976,78-81.
注四: Berne,Games people play,chapter 5.
注五:James,J.,『Positive payoffs after games'.TAJ,6,3,1976,259-62.
第25章
注一：Berne,Games people play,chapters 6-12 and Index of Games.
注二：我們不知道有哪個正式名稱的心理遊戲,是從迫害者轉換成拯救者，或是從受害者轉換成拯救者的。根據戲劇三角形角色轉換的觀點將心理遊戲分類時，也可以從強化哪一種心理地位來分類。
注三: Gouldings,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapter 4.
注四:James,J.,『Positive payoffs after games'. TAJ,6,3,1976,259-62.
注五: Woollams,S.,『When fewer strokes are better'.TAJ,6,3,1976,270-1.
第26章
注一：關於合約的本質和功能，請參考：
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 4 and Glossary.
James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...，chapter 5.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 9.
Gouldings,Changing lives through redecision therapy,chapter 4.
Steiner,Scripts people live,Introduction and chapter 20.
Woollams and Brown,Transactional analysis,chapter 12.
注二：James.M.,『Self-reparenting'.工作坊中示範EATA conference 1985,未出版。經由I.Stewart修改而成.(工作坊中示範1986，未出版)。
James,M.,It's never too late to be happy.Reading：Addision-Wesley，1985.chapter 7.
第27章
注一：關於自主性的看法，請參考：
Berne,Games people play,chapters 16,17.
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 13.
James and Jongeward,Born to win,chapter 10.
Steiner,Scripts people live,chapters 26,27,28.
注二: Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 16.
James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...,chapter 4.
注三: Berne,Transactional analysis in psychotherapy,chapter 14.
Berne,Principles of group treatment,chapter 12.
Berne,What do you say...,chapter 18.
注四: TAJ,10,2,1980.
注五: Nelson, Portia,『Autobiography in five short chapters'.In: Black,Claudia,Repeat after me. Denver:M.A.C.Printing and Publications,1985.
第28章
注一: James,M.,『Self-reparenting.theory and process'.TAJ,4,3,1974,32-9.
James,M.,It's never too late to be happy.Reading:Addison-Wesley,1985.
注二：關於TA的三個學派，請參考：
Barnes,G.,『Introduction'.In：Barnes(ed.),Transactionst analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 1.還可參考書中所附的三篇文章，分別描繪出古典、再決定和能量(或貫注)三個學派的主要特色：
Dusay,J.,『The evolution of transactional analysis'.In:Barnes(ed.),op.cit.,chapter 2.
Schiff,J.,『One hundred children generate a lot of TA'.In: Barnes(ed.),op.cit.,chapter 3.
Goulding,R.,『No magic at Mt. Madonna: redecisions in marathon therapy'.In: Barnes(ed.),op.cit.,chapter 4.
注三: Crossman,P.,『Permission and protection'.TAB,5,19,1966,152-4.
第29章
注一：不同領域運用TA時有什麼差別，請參考：
Clarke,J.,『Differences between special fields and clinical groups'.TAJ,11,2,1981,169-70.所謂「特殊領域」(special fields)這個名詞，ITAA曾經用來指臨床以外的領域，但是現在已經不這麼說了。
注二：關於TA在機構裡的運用，請參考：
Barker,D.,TA and training.London:Gower,1980.
Blakeney,R.,『Organizational cure,or organizational effectiveness'.TAJ,10,2,1980,154-7.
James,M.,The OK boss. Reading:Addison-Wesley,1976.
Jongeward,D.,Everybody wins: TA applied to organizations.Reading:Addison-Wesley,1973.
Jongeward,D.,and Blakeney,R.,『Guidelines for organizational applications of transactional analysis'.TAJ,9,3,174- 8.
注三：關於TA在教育中的運用，請參考：
Ernst,K.,Games students play.Millbrae:Celestial Arts,1972.
Hesterley,O.,『Cure in the classroom'.TAJ,10,2,1980,158- 9.
James,M.,and Jongeward,D.,The people book:transactional analysis for students.Reading: Addison-Wesley,1975.
Stapledon,R.,De-gaming teaching and learning.Statesboro:Effective Learning Publications, 1979.
第30章
注一：這段關於伯恩一生的簡介主要是根據下列資料：
Cheney,W.,『Eric Berne: biographical sketch'.TAJ,1,1,1971,14- 22.
Dusay,J.,『The evolution of transactional analysis'.In: Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 2.
Hostie,R.,『Eric Berne in search of ego-states'.In: Stern(ed.),TA: the state of the art,chapter 2.
James,M.,『Eric Berne,the development of TA, and the ITAA'.In: James(ed.),Techniques in transactional analysis...,chapter 2.
注二: Cranmer,R.,『Eric Berne: annotated bibliography.'TAJ,1,1,1971,23-9.
注三: Schiff,J.,『One hundred children generate a lot of TA'In: Barnes(ed.),Transactional analysis after Eric Berne,chapter 3.
注四：這一段對ITAA發展的描述主要是根據注一所提Cheney，Dusay和James等人的文章。
注五：從一九七一年到一九八○年ITAA會員人數的資料取材自McNeel.J.,『Letter from the editor'.TAJ,11,1,1981,4.後幾年會員人數的資料則取材自每期TA期刊標明'The ITAA'那頁所附的資料。
注六：Allaway, J.,『Transactional analysis in Britain: the beginnings'. Transactions,1,1,1983,5-10.
注七: The script,May-June 1987,page 7.