讀古今文學網 > 一萬年的爆發:文明如何加速人類進化 > 結論 >

結論

隨著現代人類擴張並走出非洲,爆發了一場創新。在擴張之前,在非洲就有這類改變的跡象,然而在解剖學意義上的現代人類遭遇並取代尼安德特人之後,這一跡象大約兩萬年後在歐洲大大強化。從考古學記錄上看,由創新過渡到全面的行為現代性不規則地發生在許多地方,之後最終在亞歐大陸的其他地區完成。我們提出的觀點是,即便從尼安德特人(或其他遠古人類)身上流向解剖學意義上的現代人類的基因流很有限,這也有助於現代人類獲取大部分他們所需要的優勢等位基因。我們相信這短時間內大量湧入的適應性基因組對「人類革命」所需的能力的貢獻良多,我們也同樣相信來自遠古人類群體的基因滲入會被證實在現代人類起源的故事中有中心的地位。

所以截至大約4萬年前,人類在身體結構上和行為上都變得現代(這不是說他們就完全像今天的人們一樣了)。他們有著比他們的祖先遠為強大的創新力量,很可能得益於從他們的尼安德特表親身上偷得的基因。文化改變的速度增長了幾十倍,而當冰川後退之後新的機會湧現,改變的速度就更快了。

[1]Roy C.Anderson,「The Ecological Relationships of Meningeal Worm and Native Cervids in North America,」Journal of Wildlife Diseases 8,no.4(1972):304—310.

[2]Daniel M.Tompkins et al.,「Parapoxvirus Causes a Deleterious Disease in Red Squirrels Associated with UK Population Declines,」Proceedingsof the Royal Society,B:Biological Sciences 269,no.1490(2002):529.

[3]Richard Klein,The Human Career(Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1999),524.

[4]Richard Klein,The Dawn of Human Culture(New York:Wiley,2002),270.

[5]Christopher S.Henshilwood et al.,「Emergence of Modern Human Behavior:Middle Stone Age Engravings from South Africa,」Science 295,no.5558(2002):1278—1280.

[6]Carleton S.Coon,The Origin of Races(New York:Alfred A.Knopf,1963).

[7]Chris Stringer and Peter Andrews,「Genetic and Fossil Evidence for the Origin of Modern Humans,」Science 239,no.4845(1988):1263—1268.

[8]D.Curnoe et al.,「Timing and Tempo of Primate Speciation,」Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19,no.1(2006):59—65.

[9]Hilde Vervaecke and Linda Van Elsacker,「Hybrids between Common Chimpanzees(Pan troglodytes)and Pygmy Chimpanzees(Pan paniscus)in Captivity,」Mammalia(Paris)56,no.4(1992):667—669.

[10]Trenton W.Holliday,「Speciation by Distance and Temporal Overlap:A New Approach to Understanding Neanderthal Evolution,」in Neanderthals Revisited:New Approaches and Perspectives,edited by T.Harrison and K.Harvati(New York:Sinauer,2006).

[11]J.Sweeney and T.Samansky,「Elements of Successful Facility Design:Marine Mammals,」in Conservation of Endangered Species in Captivity:An Interdisciplinary Approach,edited by E.F.Gibbons,B.Durrant,and J.Demarest(New York:State University of New York Press,1995).

[12]關於混合尼安德特人基因被認為不顯著這一點,可見(舉例):Chris Stringer and Peter Andrews,The Complete World of Human Evolution(London:Thames and Hudson,2005)。或可見:Klein,The Dawn of Human Culture.

[13]Milford Wolpoff et al.,「Modern Human Ancestry at the Peripheries:A Test of the Replacement Theory,」Science 291,no.5502(2001):293—297.

[14]可以想到的就有芝加哥大學的瑪莎·漢博林和安娜·迪·裡恩佐在少數意大利人身上發現的達菲(Duffy)血型基因附近一個區的極端特殊形式,與我們在所有其他人類身上看到的都很不一樣。M.T.Hamblin and A.Di Rienzo,「Detectionof the Signature of Natural Selection in Humans:Evidence from the Duffy Blood Group Locus,」American Journal of Human Genetics 66,no.5(2000):1669–1679.

[15]Amos Zayed and Charles W.Whitfield,「A Genome-Wide Signature of Positive Selection in Ancient and Recent Invasive Expansions of the Honey Bee Apis mellifera,」Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105,no.9(2008):3421.

[16]H.C.Stutz and L.K.Thomas,「Hybridization and Introgression in Cowania and Purshia,」Evolution 18,no.2(1964):183—195.

[17]Brian Hare et al.,「The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs,」Science 298,no.5598(2002):1634—1636.

[18]Henry Harpending and Jay Sobus,「Sociopathy as an Adaptation,」Ethology and Sociobiology 8,no.3(1987):63—72.

[19]Richard W.Bulliet,The Camel and the Wheel(Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1975).

[20]David W.Frayer,「Evolution at the European Edge:Neanderthal and Upper Paleolithic Relationships,」Prehistoire Europeenne 2(1993):9—69;David W.Frayer,「Perspectives on Neandertals as Ancestors,」in Conceptual Issues in Modern Human Origins Research,edited by G.A.Clark and C.M.Willermet(New York:Aldine de Gruyter,1998),220—234.

[21]Cidalia Duarte et al.,「The Early Upper Paleolithic Human Skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho(Portugal)and Modern Human Emergence in Iberia,」Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96(1999):7604—7609;Eric Trinkaus,「Early Modern Humans,」Annual Review of Anthropology 34(2005):207—230.

[22]D.Serre et al.,「No Evidence of Neandertal mtDNA Contributionto Early Modern Humans,」PLoS Biology 2,no.3(2004):313—317;M.Currat and L.Excoffier,「Modern Humans Did Not Admix with Neanderthals during Their Range Expansion into Europe,」PLoS Biology 2,no.12(2004):e21;T.D.Weaver and C.C.Roseman,「Ancient DNA,Late Neandertal Survival,and Modern-Human–Neandertal Genetic Admixture,」Current Anthropology 46,no.4(2005):677—683.

[23]Daniel Garrigan et al.,「Deep Haplotype Divergence and Long-Range Linkage Disequilibrium at Xp21.1Provides Evidence That Humans Descend from a Structured Ancestral Population,」Genetics 170(2005a):1849—1856;Daniel Garrigan et al.,「Evidence for Archaic Asian Ancestry on the Human X Chromosome,」Molecular Biology and Evolution 22(2005b):189—192;J.Hardy et al.,「Evidence Suggesting That Homo neanderthalensis Contributed the H2MAPT Haplotype to Homo sapiens,」Biochemical Society Transactions 33(2005):582—585;Vincent Plagnol and Jeffrey D.Wall,「Possible Ancestral Structure in Human Populations,」PLoS Genetics 2(2006):e105;P.D.Evans et al.,「Microcephalin,a Gene Regulating Brain Size,Continues to Evolve Adaptively in Humans,」Science 309,no.5741(2005):1717—1720;P.D.Evans et al.,「Evidence That the Adaptive Allele of the Brain Size Gene Microcephalin Introgressed into Homo sapiens from an Archaic Homo Lineage,」Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103,no.48(2006):18178.

[24]Vincent Plagnol and Jeffrey D.Wall,「Possible Ancestral Structurein Human Populations,」PLoS Genetics 2(2006):e105.

[25]Patrick D.Evans et al.,「Evidence That the Adaptive Allele of the Brain Size Gene Microcephalin Introgressed into Homo sapiens from an Archaic Homo Lineage,」Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103,no.48(2006):18178.

[26]Graham K.Coop et al.,「The Timing of Selection at the Human FOXP2Gene,」Molecular Biology and Evolution 25,no.7(2008):1257.

[27]Johannes Krause et al.,「The Derived FOXP2Variant of Modern Humans Was Shared with Neandertals,」Current Biology 17,no.21(2007):1908—1912.

[28]James O』Connell and James Allen,「Dating the Colonization of Sahul(Pleistocene Australia—New Guinea):A Review of Recent Research,」Journal of Archaeological Science 31,no.6(2004):835—853.